Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Implementing Cardiac Rehabilitation as a First-Line Treatment for Stable Angina Pectoris: PERSPECTIVES OF
Eva W Verkerk1, Esther Deuning-Smit, Noa Beernink
1Author Affiliations: IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (Dr Verkerk, Dr Deuning-Smit, Ms Schlief, and Dr Kool); Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (Ms Beernink, Dr Heutinck, Dr de Koning, and Dr Thijssen); Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (Drs Heutinck and Dr Kemps); Department of Cardiology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands (Dr Kemps); and Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom (Dr Thijssen).
Clinicians face barriers implementing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for stable angina pectoris (SAP) despite its benefits. More evidence, guideline clarity, and professional support are needed to establish CR as a first-choice treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a potential alternative to revascularization for stable angina pectoris (SAP).
- Understanding implementation barriers and facilitators is crucial for optimizing CR use.
- Previous research has not fully explored clinician and patient perspectives on CR for SAP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess barriers and facilitators for implementing CR as a first-choice treatment for SAP.
- To identify clinician and patient perspectives on CR adoption.
- To inform strategies for improving CR accessibility for SAP patients.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study involving interviews with 12 clinicians and 6 patients in the Netherlands.
- Analysis using the theoretical domains framework for inductive and deductive approaches.
- Exploration of perceived and expected barriers and facilitators to CR as a primary treatment.
Main Results:
- 44 barriers and 28 facilitators identified across 8 themes.
- Clinician barriers include lack of evidence, guideline ambiguity, knowledge gaps, perceived effort, lack of support, and organizational issues.
- Patient facilitators include openness to CR and trust in clinicians; no major patient barriers were reported.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians encounter significant barriers in proposing CR over revascularization for SAP.
- Enhanced evidence, guideline clarity, and professional association support are essential for CR implementation.
- Addressing clinician-reported barriers is key to making CR a preferred initial strategy for SAP.
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
