Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
Published on: May 10, 2017
Radiofrequency Ablation of the Intraturbinate Posterior Nasal Nerve Versus Medical Treatment for Chronic Rhinitis
Yi-Li Hwang1, Jyun-Yi Liao2, Han-Lo Teng2,3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi.
Abstract:
BackgroundMedical treatment has been the mainstay of chronic rhinitis management. Meanwhile, innovative minimally invasive nasal surgery has shown promising results. The therapeutic outcomes of these surgical interventions compared with medical treatment in chronic rhinitis have not been discussed previously.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinate of the intraturbinate segment of the posterior nasal nerve (RAPN) in comparison with intranasal corticosteroid spray (INCS) plus oral antihistamines for the treatment of chronic rhinitis.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with chronic rhinitis who had an inadequate response to medication. Inclusion criteria included a 24-h Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) ≥4 and a rhinorrhea score ≥1. Patients with prior nasal surgeries, caudal septal deviation, or acute/chronic rhinosinusitis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the change in 24-h rTNSS and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores at the 3-month follow-up.ResultsA total of 64 patients were included: 44 received RAPN, and 20 received INCS. Baseline rTNSS was 7.3 ± 2.1 for RAPN and 6.9 ± 2.3 for INCS (p = .497). Both groups showed significant improvement in rTNSS and NOSE scores at 1 and 3 months (p < .001). However, the RAPN group demonstrated significantly greater improvement than the INCS group at 1 to 3 months of follow-up (p = .001). Subscore analysis revealed that rhinorrhea (at 1 and 3 months) and sneezing (at 1 month) did not differ significantly between groups. One case of postoperative anterior epistaxis was noted in the RAPN group.ConclusionsBoth INCS and RAPN are highly effective in alleviating chronic rhinitis symptoms. Although RAPN does not establish definitive superiority over medical therapy across all neurogenic domains, it provides comparable, sustained symptom control with the distinct advantage of drug-free maintenance, offering a valuable therapeutic alternative.

