Strengthening Rural Health With N-of-1 Trials and Single-Case Experimental Designs
Jane Nikles1, Suzanne McDonald2,3
1RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The Challenge:
Rural and remote clinicians frequently make treatment decisions under conditions of uncertainty, exacerbated by limited access to specialist services, fewer locally available treatment options, and evidence that may not fully inform care for an individual patient.
The Opportunity:
N-of-1 trials and related single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) offer a structured method for generating individual-level evidence to support treatment decisions yet remain rarely used in routine clinical practice. Beyond informing care for individual patients, aggregated N-of-1 trials can also generate evidence that is directly relevant to rural populations and models of care.
Implications:
This editorial outlines the potential of N-of-1 trials and SCEDs in rural and remote health and argues that increasing awareness, training, and practical support could enable their wider adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Experimental Designs
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

