Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Cost-Effectiveness of Fetal Fibronectin Testing in Women at Risk for Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Dina Abushanab1, Nader Al-Dewik2,3,4,5,6, Reem AlNasr2
1Office of Vice President for Health and Medical Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Clinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research : CEOR
|August 14, 2026
Summary
The fetal fibronectin (fFN) test accurately predicts preterm delivery, improving outcomes and saving costs. This study found fFN testing to be cost-effective in managing preterm labor symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Health Economics
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Preterm birth is a significant concern, necessitating accurate identification of true preterm labor.
- The fetal fibronectin (fFN) test is a diagnostic tool used to predict the likelihood of preterm delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing compared to no fFN testing.
- To assess the impact of fFN testing on identifying true preterm labor in at-risk pregnant women.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 519 women with preterm labor symptoms (24-34 weeks gestation).
- Comparison of outcomes between women who received fFN testing and those who did not.
- Decision-tree model to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for successful delivery within 48 hours.
Main Results:
- The proportion of deliveries within 48 hours was significantly higher in the fFN testing group (94% vs. 80%, P<0.0001).
- fFN testing was associated with a cost saving of QAR6,470 (US$1,777) per successful delivery.
- Improved short-term clinical outcomes were observed with fFN testing.
Conclusions:
- fFN testing demonstrates cost-effectiveness and improves short-term clinical outcomes in managing preterm labor.
- Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the retrospective design and baseline differences between groups.