Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

High-Throughput, In-Field Screening of Photosynthetic Efficiency in Crop Plants Using an Autonomous Robot
Published on: January 9, 2026
Trade-off between yield and quality driven by artificial domestication in Gleditsia sinensis: Phenotypic and
Ganggang Zhang1,2,3, Ruilin Zhang1,4, Jingyang Feng1
1College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Abstract:
Gleditsia sinensis is an ecological and economic native tree species, yet previous origin-based studies suffer from genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions, lacking systematic comparisons of morphology-metabolism associations between cultivated and wild types without environmental bias. To address this, pod/seed morphology and key quality traits of 15 G. sinensis germplasms (one wild control, 14 cultivars) were evaluated in a common garden, integrating analysis of variance (ANOVA), random forest, correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), and cluster analyses. Cultivars significantly outperformed the wild type in pod dry weight, 1000-seed weight, and total saponins, whereas the wild type accumulated significantly higher total polyphenols and flavonoids. Phenotypic variation was greater in pods than in seeds, and morphological variation of both pods and seeds exceeded that of nutritional quality, indicating that the latter exhibits higher genetic stability. Random forest identified seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight, seed dry weight, and pod dry weight as the top predictors for nutritional quality. Notably, larger and heavier structures correlated negatively with total polyphenols, flavonoids, total sugar, and crude fiber, but positively with pectin, ash, soluble protein, and total soluble sugar, suggesting a potential growth-defense trade-off. Multidimensional evaluation categorized the germplasms into four distinct clusters (Cluster I: YJ5, YJ4, YJ6; Cluster II: JD2, JD3, JD9, JD10, YJ3; Cluster III: CK, JD1; Cluster IV: JD7, YJ10, YJ2, JD11, YL1). Within these, JD9, YJ2, and YJ10 demonstrated balanced agronomic and nutritional performance, making them promising comprehensive cultivars. Meanwhile, the wild type (CK) and JD1 are highlighted as crucial donor parents for nutritional improvement, whereas YJ5 and YJ6 are ideal materials for enhancing morphological traits. Ultimately, this study elucidates the potential growth-defense trade-off during woody plant domestication, providing a scientific basis for the differentiated directional breeding and the utilization of wild genes in G. sinensis.
Related Concept Videos
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Monohybrid Crosses
Dihybrid Crosses
Plant Tissue Culture
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Incomplete Dominance

