Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Climate-sensitive exposures and cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Alireza Negahi1, Amirhosein Naseri2, Hossein Najdsepas1
1Breast Health & Cancer Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Climate change environmental exposures like wildfire smoke and air pollution have uncertain cancer risks. Research shows fragile, low-certainty evidence, highlighting the need for better studies on wildfire and PM2.5 carcinogenicity.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Oncology
- Climate Science
Background:
- Climate change exacerbates environmental exposures such as wildfire smoke, air pollution, extreme heat, and disasters.
- These exposures have plausible, yet unquantified, impacts on cancer incidence, mortality, survival, and recurrence.
- No prior synthesis has jointly examined these diverse exposures and cancer outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically synthesize evidence on the association between climate change-related environmental exposures and various cancer outcomes.
- To quantify the risks and assess the certainty of evidence for these associations.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of five databases for observational studies up to May 2026.
- Inclusion of studies on wildfire, ambient temperature, disaster, precipitation anomaly, or PM2.5 exposure and cancer outcomes.
- Meta-analysis using random-effects models with robust variance estimation (RVE) to account for within-cohort dependence.
Main Results:
- The overall association between environmental exposures and cancer was null after accounting for within-cohort dependence (RVE 1.02 (0.93-1.11)).
- Uncorrected estimates were inflated due to correlated effects and high heterogeneity (I²=97%).
- Wildfire exposure showed a non-significant increase in cancer mortality; PM2.5 was linked to poorer survival; higher temperature effects were inconsistent.
Conclusions:
- The evidence is statistically fragile and of low certainty, not supporting a single overall effect.
- Priorities for future research include adequately powered, dependence-aware studies on wildfire and PM2.5 carcinogenicity within a planetary health framework.
- Disaster-related disruption of cancer care also requires further investigation.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...