CT-based multi-threshold calcium scoring for aortic valve assessment: comparable predictive performance across HU

Michael Welt1, Mohammad Alnees2,3, Yazan Hamdan2

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaplan Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.

Insights

Higher Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds for computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcium (CT-AVC) scoring do not improve hemodynamic assessment in severe aortic stenosis. Conventional 130-HU scoring remains comparable for stratifying severity in high-flow/high-gradient cases.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Severe aortic stenosis (AS) requires accurate hemodynamic assessment.
  • Computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcium (CT-AVC) scoring is used to evaluate AS severity.
  • The optimal Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold for CT-AVC scoring in high-flow/high-gradient AS is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if higher HU thresholds for CT-AVC scoring offer added hemodynamic or discriminatory value beyond the conventional 130-HU Agatston score.
  • To assess the association of varying CT-AVC HU thresholds with transvalvular gradients and aortic valve area in severe AS.
  • To determine the discriminatory performance of different HU thresholds for identifying very severe hemodynamic burden.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 63 pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients with severe AS.
  • CT-AVC quantification at 130, 200, 500, 800, and 1000 HU.
  • Correlation and multivariable linear regression to assess associations with peak/mean gradients and aortic valve area.
  • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare discrimination of very severe hemodynamic burden.

Main Results:

  • CT-AVC at all HU thresholds was independently associated with higher peak and mean gradients.
  • No statistically significant associations were found between CT-AVC and aortic valve area.
  • Discrimination of very severe hemodynamic burden was modest and comparable across all HU thresholds (AUC 0.65-0.67).

Conclusions:

  • In high-flow/high-gradient severe AS, CT-AVC consistently associates with transvalvular gradients across different HU thresholds.
  • Higher HU thresholds do not outperform the conventional 130-HU score for hemodynamic stratification.
  • Higher HU thresholds should be considered complementary densitometric analyses, not alternative diagnostic cut-offs.