Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

A CO2 Concentration Gradient Facility for Testing CO2 Enrichment and Soil Effects on Grassland Ecosystem Function
Published on: November 21, 2015
Microclimate-adjusted carbon density modeling improves carbon density estimation for photovoltaic-impacted grasslands
Jiaxu Wang1, Ning Lu2, Ying Sun1
1State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
A new microclimate-adjusted approach improves carbon-pool assessments at photovoltaic (PV) facilities. This method better reflects changes in dryland grasslands compared to conventional static methods.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecology
- Renewable Energy
Background:
- Conventional carbon-pool assessments at photovoltaic (PV) facilities use static land-cover values, neglecting microclimatic changes.
- This limitation is significant in drylands, where PV arrays alter thermal conditions and vegetation responses, impacting carbon dynamics.
- Existing methods fail to capture the nuanced effects of PV installations on local environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate carbon-pool changes at PV facilities in Inner Mongolia using both conventional and microclimate-adjusted approaches.
- To introduce and validate a novel method (M2) that incorporates microclimate adjustments (δ_micro) into carbon-pool assessments.
- To compare the accuracy and effectiveness of the microclimate-adjusted approach against traditional methods.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 189 PV facilities (254 km²) in Inner Mongolia using a conventional static land-cover carbon-density approach (M1).
- Developed and applied a microclimate-adjusted approach (M2) incorporating a signed microclimate adjustment term (δ_micro).
- Conducted field-based evaluations at 42 PV facilities to compare M1 and M2 against measured carbon densities.
Main Results:
- The microclimate adjustment term (δ_micro) varied significantly across land-cover transitions, from +36.2% (bare-land-to-grassland) to -12.6% (grassland-to-bare-land).
- The microclimate-adjusted approach (M2) demonstrated higher agreement with measured carbon densities (R² = 0.730) than the conventional approach (M1, R² = 0.624).
- M2 showed lower site-level absolute errors and significant differences in paired tests (p < 0.05) compared to M1.
Conclusions:
- Microclimate-adjusted accounting significantly improves carbon-pool assessment accuracy at PV facilities, especially in dryland grasslands.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering PV-induced microclimatic modifications for precise environmental impact assessments.
- This approach offers context-sensitive data for vegetation management and land-use screening following PV construction.
More Related Videos
09:55Surface Renewal: An Advanced Micrometeorological Method for Measuring and Processing Field-Scale Energy Flux Density Data
Published on: December 12, 2013
07:32Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.
Published on: June 4, 2021