Heart Rate Variability Patterns Differentiate Between Positive and Negative Oral Food Challenges in Children With

Naama Epstein-Rigbi1, Yael Koren2, Limor Ben-Nun Toledano3

  • 1Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Shamir (former Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Allergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Assuta Ashdod Medical Center, Ashdod, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

Insights

Heart rate variability (HRV) patterns can distinguish between true allergic reactions and subjective symptoms during oral food challenges (OFCs). This objective measure may aid in diagnosing food allergies more accurately.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Oral food challenges (OFCs) can yield ambiguous results due to subjective complaints or mild symptoms.
  • Differentiating objective allergic reactions from non-allergic responses in OFCs is clinically challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if heart rate variability (HRV) patterns can differentiate children with objective allergic reactions from those without during OFCs.
  • To explore HRV as a potential objective tool for OFC interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative cohort study analyzed HRV patterns in 104 pediatric patients undergoing OFCs.
  • Heart rate was continuously monitored using a smart wristband device.
  • The modified cardiac sympathetic index (CSI) was used to compare HRV patterns between groups.

Main Results:

  • HRV patterns significantly differed between positive (allergic) and negative (non-allergic) OFCs (p<0.001).
  • Lower modified CSI scores were observed in patients with subjective complaints and negative OFCs compared to those with positive OFCs (p=0.005).
  • Higher modified CSI scores were found in the positive OFC cohort when perioral rash was present (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • HRV patterns effectively differentiate between positive and negative OFCs, independent of subjective symptoms.
  • HRV monitoring shows promise as an objective adjunctive tool for interpreting OFC results.
  • Further research could validate HRV for improved accuracy in diagnosing food allergies.
Abstract