Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

10:25
Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025
Optimizing visualization feedback of real-time navigation for orbital reconstructions: A preclinical study
J F Sabelis1, T J J Maal2, R Bruggink2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), AMC, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|August 14, 2026
Summary
Surgeon preferences for orbital reconstruction visualization varied, with anatomical CT data and coronal views enhancing spatial understanding. Current navigation systems need improved real-time feedback for better usability.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Navigation
Background:
- Current surgical navigation systems for orbital reconstruction face challenges in real-time feedback interpretation and timing.
- Improving visualization methods is crucial for enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of orbital implant positioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different visualization methods on the efficiency and interpretability of real-time feedback during in-vitro orbital reconstruction.
- To assess surgeon preferences and usability of various visualization techniques in simulated orbital surgery.
Main Methods:
- Six surgeons of varying experience performed standardized in-vitro orbital implant positioning tasks using six different visualization modes.
- Data collected included interpretation accuracy and time to correct implant positioning.
- Visualization modes incorporated computed tomography (CT) images, 3D models, and distance mapping.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in positioning time or interpretation accuracy were found across the tested visualization methods.
- Surgeons expressed strong preferences for anatomical CT data and coronal views for improved spatial understanding.
- 3D models and instrument orientation views were perceived as less intuitive by surgeons.
Conclusions:
- While objective performance metrics showed no significant differences, surgeon usability and interpretability are critical for clinical adoption of surgical navigation systems.
- Future navigation workflows should integrate anatomical context and tailored visual support for more intuitive orbital surgery.
- A two-step strategy (3D for alignment, 2D for precision) emerged from surgeon feedback.
