Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Quantification of Diabetes-induced Adherent Leukocytes in Retinal Vasculature
Published on: January 24, 2025
Revealing the Blind Spots: Linked EHRs Associate Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Diabetic Eye Care Testing
William B Marcus1, Jeremy A Lavine1, Joshua D Stein2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 440, Chicago, IL, 60611-4494, USA.
Socioeconomic factors like sex, education, income, and insurance influence receipt of retinal imaging (fundus photography/fluorescein angiography) for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Female patients, lower income, less education, and unknown insurance status were less likely to receive this crucial diabetic retinopathy monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Retinal imaging, such as fundus photography (FP) and fluorescein angiography (FA), is more sensitive for monitoring non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) than dilated fundus examinations.
- The influence of socioeconomic factors on the utilization of these advanced retinal imaging techniques for NPDR remains largely unexamined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the associations between various socioeconomic factors and the receipt of FP or FA in patients diagnosed with moderate to severe NPDR.
- To identify potential disparities in access to essential retinal imaging for diabetic retinopathy (DR) management.
Main Methods:
- Linking data from 16 academic electronic medical record systems across multiple sites.
- Incorporating diverse socioeconomic variables and applying Cox proportional hazards modeling.
- Analyzing data from 2,082 patients diagnosed with moderate to severe NPDR.
Main Results:
- Male patients were more likely to receive imaging than females (23.3% vs. 19.2%).
- Patients with graduate degrees received imaging more often than those with bachelor's degrees.
- Higher income quartiles (2nd-4th) showed increased imaging rates compared to the lowest quartile.
- Patients with "other/unknown" insurance had lower odds of receiving imaging (HR, 0.60).
Conclusions:
- Significant disparities in retinal imaging for DR exist based on sex, education, income, and insurance status within tertiary academic centers.
- Patients who were female, of lower socioeconomic status (income/education), or had "other/unknown" insurance were less likely to undergo recommended imaging.
- Multisite electronic health record data linkage is a viable method for studying socioeconomic impacts on DR outcomes and for population health reporting.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetic Retinopathy
Blind Procedures
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Blinding

