Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026
In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Super-resolution Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound: An Exploratory Approach for Differentiating
Lu Zhang1, Jie Tian1, YiLai Chen1
1Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China (L.Z., J.T., Y.C., Q.H., C.Y., S.X., Y.D., J.Z.); College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 227 Chongqing South Road, Shanghai 200025, China (L.Z., J.T., YC., QH., C.Y., S.X., Y.D., J.Z).
Rationale And Objectives:
This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of super-resolution ultrasound (SRUS) in differentiating benign from malignant renal solid tumors by assessing microvascular characteristics, and to find if combining SRUS with conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) potential enhances diagnostic utility.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective study included 114 pathologically confirmed renal lesions. All patients underwent conventional US, CEUS, and SRUS. We analyzed qualitative and quantitative parameters of CEUS and SRUS, screened significant parameters by univariate analysis, and used a comprehensive diagnostic score method for exploratory receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to construct multiparametric diagnostic panels. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC).
Results:
Among 114 masses (88 malignant, 26 benign), malignant lesions exhibited more tortuous vessels and higher microvascular image complexity (p < 0.05). After normalization, microvascular density (MVD) and microbubble velocity showed high spatial heterogeneity in malignancies. CEUS excelled in macroscopic perfusion (AUC=0.842), while SRUS provided incremental microscopic structural information (AUC=0.678); both outperformed conventional US (AUC=0.638). Crucially, the combination of SRUS and CEUS demonstrated improved diagnostic performance (AUC=0.871) in this cohort, suggesting potential complementary value over either modality alone.
Conclusion:
SRUS non-invasively reveals unique microvascular architecture and heterogeneity in renal malignancies. The combined SRUS-CEUS approach shows promise for improving differential diagnostic accuracy. These results are exploratory and provide preliminary evidence for the potential value of SRUS in renal tumor diagnosis. Key limitations include a relatively small proportion of benign tumors, lacking correction for multiple comparisons, and lack of integration with CEUS time-intensity curve quantitative parameters.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
01:19Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
01:27Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
01:22Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography