Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Collecting Saliva and Measuring Salivary Cortisol and Alpha-amylase in Frail Community Residing Older Adults via Family Caregivers
Published on: December 18, 2013
Evaluating variability in 24-hour urine free cortisol measurements: impact of sample collection errors
Ömer Özcan1,2,3, Karlijn Koops1,2,3, Jacquelien J Hillebrand2,3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Endocrine Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Objectives:
24 hour urine free cortisol measurement is widely used for screening Cushing's syndrome, but its reliability is limited by variability due to inherent biological variation and variation introduced by collection errors. This study aimed to determine the proportion of inaccurately collected samples and evaluate the impact on urine free cortisol variability.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted using paired 24-h urine samples from subjects screened for hypercortisolism at two academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Paired 24-h urine samples from 552 subjects were evaluated. Collection accuracy was determined by comparing creatinine and urine volume differences between consecutive samples. Samples were classified as inaccurate if the creatinine difference exceeded 4 mmol/24 h or the volume difference exceeded 55 %.
Results:
19 % of paired urine collections were classified as inaccurate. Accurate collections showed lower variability in urine free cortisol concentrations (coefficient of variation 17 %) compared to inaccurate collections (coefficient of variation 33 %).
Conclusions:
This study shows that many routine 24-h urine samples are collected incorrectly. Collection errors contribute considerably to the total variability of 24-h urine free cortisol measurements. This highlights the importance of patient instruction and adherence to collection protocols for reproducibility of urine free cortisol measurements.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random and Systematic Errors
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
