Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
Underrecognized Substance Exposure in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Insights from Universal LC-MS/MS Confirmation
Zehra Kardaş1, Meda Kondolot2, Çiğdem Karakükçü3
1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Social Pediatrics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Insights
Pediatric emergency department (ED) patients may have underdiagnosed substance exposure due to limited immunoassay sensitivity. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) offers more comprehensive and sensitive toxicological detection in pediatric EDs.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Pediatric substance exposure in emergency departments (EDs) is often underrecognized.
- Routine urine immunoassays lack the analytical sensitivity for comprehensive detection.
- Objective toxicological data in pediatric ED populations are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of immunoassay screening versus liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for substance detection in pediatric ED patients.
- To identify factors associated with positive toxicological findings in pediatric ED settings.
Main Methods:
- A dual-phase observational study in two tertiary pediatric EDs involving patients aged 6-18 years.
- Retrospective phase: samples tested by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS (not both).
- Prospective phase: clinically suspected cases tested by both methods; logistic regression for associated factors.
Main Results:
- LC-MS/MS identified higher positivity rates (32.6%) compared to immunoassay screening (19.8%) in the retrospective cohort.
- In the prospective cohort, LC-MS/MS detected 11.2% positivity (18.8% with exploratory cutoff).
- Benzodiazepines and amphetamine-type stimulants were most common; younger age, psychiatric illness, and high screen time were associated with positivity.
Conclusions:
- Routine immunoassay screening may significantly underestimate pediatric substance exposure in ED settings.
- LC-MS/MS provides broader and more sensitive toxicological detection capabilities.
- Differences in detection partly reflect broader analyte coverage of LC-MS/MS.
Background:
Substance exposure among pediatric emergency department (ED) patients may be underrecognized because routine urine immunoassays have limited analytical sensitivity, and objective confirmatory toxicological data in pediatric ED populations remain limited.
Methods:
This dual-phase observational study included patients aged 6-18 years who underwent toxicological assessment in two tertiary pediatric EDs in Central Anatolia, Türkiye. The retrospective phase (2018-2021) tested each sample by either immunoassay or LC-MS/MS, depending on time of collection, but not both. The prospective phase (January 2022-2023) enrolled clinically suspected cases, all tested by both methods regardless of screening result. Logistic regression evaluated factors associated with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-confirmed positivity in the prospective cohort. Results: A total of 1039 patients were included (852 retrospective; 187 prospective). In the retrospective cohort, immunoassay screening (n = 570) identified positivity in 19.8% (113/570), while LC-MS/MS on a separate subset (n = 282) identified 32.6% (92/282); these derive from non-overlapping subsets, not paired testing. In the prospective cohort, LC-MS/MS positivity was 11.2% (21/187) by standard cutoff and 18.8% (35/187) with an exploratory limit of quantitation (LOQ)-supported benzodiazepine interpretation (after excluding 18 pseudoephedrine/ephedrine-only patients). Benzodiazepines and amphetamine-type stimulants were most frequently detected. Younger age, psychiatric illness, and daily screen exposure >3 h were independently associated with positivity. Immunoassay screening showed high specificity but limited sensitivity against LC-MS/MS. Conclusions: Routine immunoassay screening may substantially underestimate pediatric substance exposure in ED settings. LC-MS/MS provides broader and more sensitive toxicological detection, though differences also partly reflect broader analyte coverage rather than sensitivity alone.
More Related Videos
07:34Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS)
Published on: March 14, 2013
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...