Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
Published on: August 24, 2013
Scaling up Genomics: A Mainstream Model of Care in Nephrology
Kushani Jayasinghe1,2,3, Rigan Tytherleigh4,5,6, Stephanie Best7
1Department of Nephrology, Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Key Points:
We evaluated a hub and spoke mainstreaming model to enable nephrologists to order genomic tests independently in their clinic across the state of Victoria. Over 1000 tests were ordered, with the diagnostic yield remaining similar regardless of ordered by local nephrologists or tertiary genomics services. A mainstreaming model proved feasible, scalable, and clinically effective, offering a practical framework for integrating genomics to routine kidney care.
Background:
Genomic testing has substantial diagnostic and clinical value in nephrology, yet integrating testing into routine care requires service-level changes to ensure timely and equitable access.
Methods:
We conducted an observational cohort study at four tertiary centers, with a pragmatic, quasi-experimental design to evaluate evidence-informed, service-level interventions to make genomic testing more accessible and routinely embedded within nephrology practice. We implemented a hub and spoke model which provided nephrologists with training, practical resources, and regular case-based discussions, to support test ordering and interpretation within their own clinics. Laboratory audits (June 2021-July 2024) evaluated how public reimbursement and implementation interventions influenced testing patterns. Three periods were compared: prefunding, postfunding, and postintervention.
Results:
Across the study period, 1028 genomic tests were ordered (63% adults, 37% children; median age 32 years). Results were available for 1014 tests, with an overall diagnostic yield of 34%, which remained stable across all time points. The diagnostic yield was similar regardless of whether testing occurred at tertiary genomics services (249 of 772, 32%) or via local nephrologists (92 of 242, 38%). The number of unique providers ordering tests was higher (T1: 37, T2: 69, T3: 87). The proportion of testing in mainstream nephrology settings rose from 23% to 74%, while absolute testing numbers in multidisciplinary clinics remained consistent over the study period.
Conclusion:
Mainstreaming genomic testing in nephrology was feasible, scalable, and clinically effective. This model was associated with better access without compromising diagnostic yield and provides a practical framework for integrating genomic medicine into routine kidney care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genomics
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Overview
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

