Related Experiment Videos
Epidural 0.125% ropivacaine is safe but insufficient for induced tibiotarsal joint pain
Jordyn M Boesch1, Gillian A Perkins1, Amy B Todd-Donato1
1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Background:
Epidural injection of a low concentration of the local anaesthetic ropivacaine produces analgesia without neurological deficits or ileus in people.
Objective:
To determine if epidural 0.125% ropivacaine mitigates induced hindlimb lameness in horses while preserving neurological function and gastrointestinal (GI) motility.
Study Design:
Randomised, blinded, controlled, crossover study.
Methods:
Eight healthy, sound horses underwent two treatments in random order, separated by at least 3 weeks: epidural saline or epidural ropivacaine. For each treatment, an epidural catheter was inserted at the first intercoccygeal space and advanced 5 cm cranially. Correct catheter placement was confirmed radiographically after injecting contrast through it. The tibiotarsal joint was injected with 75 ng of recombinant equine interleukin-1β to induce synovitis. Twelve hours later, baseline variables were recorded, including heart rate, respiratory rate, borborygmi, lameness score and neurological examination score. Thirty minutes thereafter [time = 0 h (t0)], 0.045 mL/kg of preservative-free 0.9% saline or 0.125% ropivacaine was administered through the catheter over 10 min. Data were collected at t0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, and 6.5. Faecal piles passed the 24 h before and after t0 were counted. Continuous and categorical data were analysed using a linear mixed effects model and Fisher's exact test, respectively, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results:
All horses developed moderate-to-severe lameness that did not improve after ropivacaine injection. No horses developed hindlimb neurological deficits. However, from t0.5-2.5, more horses in the ropivacaine (7/8) than saline (0/7) treatment had decreased to absent anus and tail tone (p = 0.014). There were no other significant differences between treatments.
Main Limitations:
A single volume, concentration, and injection rate were tested.
Conclusions:
A single dose of 0.125% ropivacaine did not mitigate hindlimb lameness. Anus and tail tone decreased, but hindlimb neurological function and GI motility were preserved.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Analgesia and Pain Management
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...