Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
When might we consider using the newer β-lactam agents as empirical therapy against presumed carbapenem-resistant
Stelios F Assimakopoulos1, Sofia Ioannou2, Jesús Rodriguez-Bano3,4
1Department of Internal Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Patras School of Medicine, Patras, Greece.
Background:
Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) pathogens-including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii-are a major global health threat. Newer β-lactam agents including novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and other recently introduced β-lactam agents have expanded treatment options. However, although current guidelines focus on their use as targeted therapy, their role in empirical treatment of suspected bacterial sepsis remains unclear.
Methods:
In this review we evaluate epidemiological studies, randomized trials, comparative observational studies, international guidelines, microbiological surveillance data on CRGN infections and clinical factors supporting consideration of empirical use of newer β-lactam agents in patients with sepsis at risk for CRGN infection.
Results:
Carbapenem resistance epidemiology varies substantially across regions and strongly affects the likelihood of CRGN infection. Key risk factors include prior CRGN colonization or infection, recent broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure, prolonged hospitalization and healthcare contact in high-prevalence settings. In sepsis, delayed effective antimicrobial therapy-particularly in septic shock or severe immunosuppression-is associated with poorer outcomes. However, indiscriminate empirical use of newer β-lactam agents may promote resistance and compromise stewardship efforts. Direct evidence supporting empirical use of these agents remains limited and is based largely on observational data and extrapolation from targeted-therapy studies. Empirical use of newer agents may be appropriate for carefully selected patients with a high probability of CRGN infection and clinical scenarios where delayed active therapy could have serious consequences.
Conclusion:
A risk-stratified, stewardship-integrated approach incorporating local epidemiology, patient-level risk factors, illness severity and rapid diagnostics may optimize timely effective therapy while preserving the long-term utility of these agents.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Development of Antibiotic Resistance