Unintended Distal Embolisation of A Drug-Coated Balloon During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: When Is Leaving the Device in Situ Feasible?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Myocardial Infarction by Percutaneous Embolization Coil Deployment in a Swine Model
Published on: November 4, 2021
1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
Device dislodgment during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is rare. Conservative management of distal drug-coated balloon embolisation may be safe if coronary flow is preserved, avoiding retrieval risks.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carries risks, including device dislodgment.
- Complications like myocardial perforation and coronary artery dissection can occur during balloon angioplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report a case of distal drug-coated balloon (DCB) embolisation during PCI.
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of conservative management for embolised devices.
Main Methods:
- A 67-year-old woman with in-stent restenosis underwent PCI with a DCB.
- Angiography confirmed DCB separation and distal embolisation.
- Conservative management was chosen due to distal device location and retrieval risks.
Main Results:
- Despite DCB embolisation, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 was maintained.
- The patient remained asymptomatic at 12-month follow-up without ischaemic or device-related events.
- Final angiography showed no procedural complications.
Conclusions:
- Conservative management of distal DCB embolisation can be a safe and feasible strategy in selected patients.
- Leaving an embolised device in situ is viable when distal flow is preserved and retrieval risks are high.
Background:
Balloon angioplasty can lead to multiple complications, such as myocardial perforation and dissection of coronary arteries. Device dislodgment during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication.
Case Description:
We report on a 67-year-old woman presenting with acute coronary syndrome due to in-stent restenosis of the left circumflex artery, treated with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) following lesion preparation. During DCB retrieval resistance was encountered, and angiography revealed separation of the balloon from its shaft with distal embolisation. Despite this, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 was preserved. After multidisciplinary discussion, conservative management was chosen due to the distal location of the embolised device and risks associated with retrieval. Final angiography showed no procedural complication, and at 12-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic without ischaemic or device-related events.
Conclusion:
This example shows that in certain patients with intact coronary flow and no procedural complications, conservative therapy of distal DCB embolisation might be a safe and feasible strategy.
Learning Points:
This case highlights that, in selected patients, leaving an embolised device in situ may be a safe and feasible strategy when distal flow is preserved and procedure risks outweigh benefits of retrieval.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
