Related Experiment Videos
Isolation policies in musculoskeletal infection care: time to move from tradition to evidence
Laura Bessems1,2, Jolien Onsea1,2, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker3,4
1Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract:
A recent scoping review found no evidence supporting routine ward-level isolation or dedicated septic wards for non-multidrug-resistant organism musculoskeletal infections when standard precautions are applied, whereas targeted measures remain appropriate for multidrug-resistant organisms. An international survey revealed wide variation in attitudes and a persistent belief in supporting evidence, highlighting a gap between evidence and perception and supporting a differentiated, risk-based approach to isolation.
Insights
Routine isolation is not supported for most musculoskeletal infections. Targeted measures are appropriate for multidrug-resistant organisms, highlighting a need for evidence-based, risk-stratified infection control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Infection Control
- Musculoskeletal Infections
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Standard precautions are crucial in healthcare settings.
- Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) pose significant infection control challenges.
- Current isolation practices for musculoskeletal infections vary widely.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the evidence for routine isolation in musculoskeletal infections.
- To assess the gap between evidence and clinical perception regarding isolation practices.
- To advocate for a differentiated, risk-based approach to infection control.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a scoping review of existing literature.
- Performed an international survey to gauge healthcare professionals' attitudes and beliefs.
- Analyzed evidence versus perceived evidence for isolation strategies.
Main Results:
- No evidence supports routine ward-level isolation for non-MDRO musculoskeletal infections with standard precautions.
- Targeted isolation measures remain appropriate for MDROs.
- Significant variation in attitudes and persistent belief in unsupported evidence were observed.
Conclusions:
- A differentiated, risk-based approach to isolation is warranted.
- Clinical practice should align with evidence, distinguishing between MDRO and non-MDRO infections.
- Addressing the evidence-perception gap is essential for optimizing infection control.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Asepsis