Impact of Heart Failure Phenotype on Functional Outcomes After Carotid Artery Stenting
Youssef Soliman1, Farhan Siddiq2, Ameer E Hassan3
1Sheikh Khalifa Stroke Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Insights
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) experience worse functional recovery after carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This highlights the need to consider HF phenotype in CAS risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- The impact of HF phenotype on CAS outcomes is not well understood.
- This study is the first to compare short-term CAS outcomes between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare short-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with HFrEF versus HFpEF.
- To evaluate the impact of HF phenotype on functional recovery after CAS.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, prospective observational study involving 105 HF patients undergoing CAS.
- Patients were categorized into HFrEF (n=36) and HFpEF (n=69) groups.
- Primary outcome: composite of 30-day mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes: 30- and 90-day disability (modified Rankin Scale). Multivariable ordinal regression was used for analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary composite outcome between HFrEF and HFpEF groups (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p=0.561).
- HFrEF patients had significantly worse functional outcomes at 30 and 90 days (higher mRS scores, p<0.01).
- HFrEF was independently associated with a higher risk of poor functional outcome at 30 and 90 days (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), not HFpEF, independently predicts poorer functional recovery post-CAS.
- HF phenotype is crucial for risk stratification and improving patient selection and peri-procedural management in CAS.
- Clinical guidelines should incorporate HF phenotype for optimized patient care.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS), but its impact on outcomes by HF phenotype is unclear. This is the first study to compare short-term CAS outcomes between patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Methods:
This multicenter, prospective observational study started by screening 889 patients from the CASSH registry. After applying predefined criteria, 105 patients with heart failure undergoing CAS were included (69 HFpEF, 36 HFrEF). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day procedure-related mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included disability, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 30 days and at 90 days. Multivariable ordinal regression was used to assess the independent association between HF phenotype and poor functional outcome.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome occurred in 5.6% of HFrEF patients versus 1.4% of HFpEF patients (p = 0.561). However, functional outcomes were significantly worse in the HFrEF group, with higher mean mRS scores at 30 days (2.7 vs. 1.6, p = 0.003) and 90 days (2.7 vs. 1.4, p = 0.001). All-cause mortality was 11.1% in HFrEF vs. 1.4% in HFpEF (p = 0.085). After adjustment for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, and preprocedural mRS, HFrEF was independently associated with a higher risk of poor functional outcome at 30 days (β = 0.89, p = 0.018) and 90 days (β = 1.05, p = 0.006).
Conclusion:
HFrEF, but not HFpEF, independently predicts poorer functional recovery following CAS. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating heart failure phenotype into risk stratification and clinical guidelines to improve patient selection and peri-procedural management.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

