Related Experiment Videos
Aorto-Ostial Lesion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Clinical Characteristics, Predictors and Clinical Outcomes
Simon M Thackray1, Riley J Batchelor1,2,3, Diem Dinh2
1Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) in high-risk patients showed similar early outcomes but lower long-term survival, primarily driven by right coronary artery (RCA) interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Aorto-ostial coronary lesions pose unique challenges for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to complex anatomy and potential for poor outcomes.
- Ostial left main coronary artery (LMCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) lesions present distinct anatomical considerations and myocardial territory at risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare procedural practices and clinical outcomes between aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) and proximal non-ostial lesions in LMCA and RCA.
- To identify predictors of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing PCI for AOL.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a multicentre registry (2005-2020) comparing patients with AOL (ostial LMCA/RCA) versus non-AOL (proximal non-ostial LMCA/RCA).
- Primary outcome: long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes: in-hospital and 30-day MACE.
- Multivariable logistic regression and vessel-specific analyses were employed.
Main Results:
- The AOL group (11.5%) had higher baseline risk (older, more females, comorbidities, complex lesions) compared to the non-AOL group.
- Aorto-ostial lesion location was not an independent predictor of 30-day MACE (adjusted OR 0.93).
- Pooled long-term survival was lower in the AOL cohort; vessel-specific analysis revealed no difference for LMCA PCI but lower survival for ostial RCA PCI.
Conclusions:
- Patients undergoing AOL PCI exhibit a higher-risk profile but comparable early procedural safety and outcomes.
- The observed difference in long-term survival is largely attributed to the RCA cohort, suggesting baseline risk rather than solely periprocedural factors.
- No significant difference in outcomes between ostial and non-ostial LMCA PCI was noted.
Background:
Aorto-ostial coronary lesions represent a high-risk subset of coronary disease because of fibrocalcific disease, elastic recoil, and difficulty achieving precise stent positioning. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of these lesions may therefore be associated with less favourable outcomes than of proximal non-ostial lesions. Furthermore, ostial left main coronary artery (LMCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) lesions differ in anatomy and myocardium at risk.
Aims:
To compare procedural practice and outcomes of aorto-ostial versus proximal non-ostial PCI.
Methods:
We analysed patients from the multicentre Melbourne Interventional Group Registry who underwent PCI between 2005 and 2020. Patients treated for ostial LMCA or ostial RCA lesions (aorto-ostial lesion [AOL] group) were compared with those undergoing PCI for proximal non-ostial LMCA or RCA lesions (non-AOL group). The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with multivariable logistic regression used to identify independent predictors of 30-day MACE. Vessel-specific analysis compared ostial and non-ostial LMCA and RCA PCI separately.
Results:
Among 4683 PCI procedures, 538 (11.5%) underwent PCI for AOL and 4145 (88.5%) for proximal non-ostial LMCA or RCA lesions. Patients in the AOL group were older (70.1 vs. 65.0 years, p < 0.001), more often female (37.7% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.001), and had a greater burden of comorbidity and lesion complexity. Rotational atherectomy (4.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001) and intravascular ultrasound (5.9% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001) were used more frequently in the AOL group, although overall use was low. AOL location was not independently associated with 30-day MACE (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60-1.45; p = 0.76). Long-term survival was lower in the pooled AOL cohort (log-rank p < 0.001); vessel-specific analysis showed no difference for LMCA PCI (p = 0.69), whereas survival was lower after ostial RCA PCI (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Patients undergoing AOL PCI had a higher-risk clinical profile but similar adjusted early outcomes. In vessel-specific analyses, the pooled long-term survival difference appeared predominantly attributable to the RCA cohort, with no difference between ostial and non-ostial LMCA PCI. This may reflect differences in baseline patient risk rather than excess periprocedural risk alone.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies