Sheath-to-Artery Diameter Ratio: A Robust Predictor of Early Access-Site Adverse Events in Percutaneous Procedures

Eduardo Ismael Arteaga Chan1, Claudia Lerma1, Adriana Torres-Machorro1,2

  • 1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.

Insights

A high sheath-to-artery diameter (SHAD) ratio (≥1.07) strongly predicts vascular access site complications (VASCs) after large-bore femoral interventions. Maintaining a ratio ≤1.0 with image-guided access can significantly reduce these risks.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Vascular access site complications (VASCs) are a significant cause of morbidity following percutaneous interventions.
  • The sheath-to-femoral artery ratio is a known risk factor in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but its broader applicability is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the association between the sheath-to-artery diameter (SHAD) ratio and early VASCs in patients undergoing femoral percutaneous interventions using sheaths >6 Fr.
  • To identify optimal SHAD ratio cutoffs for predicting complications.

Main Methods:

  • A nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of 2660 patients.
  • 177 patients with VASCs within 7 days were compared to 353 propensity score-matched controls.
  • The SHAD ratio was calculated from pre-procedural computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Main Results:

  • A SHAD ratio ≥1.07 was a robust predictor of VASCs (OR 6.71, p<0.001), with an AUC of 0.83.
  • Higher SHAD ratios were observed in patients with VASCs (1.26) compared to controls (0.75).
  • Dual femoral access and procedural urgency increased risk, while ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided access were protective.

Conclusions:

  • A SHAD ratio ≥1.07 reliably predicts early VASCs in large-bore femoral interventions.
  • Maintaining a sheath-to-artery relationship ≤1.0 and using image-guided access may significantly decrease complications.
  • Pre-procedural SHAD assessment is recommended, pending external validation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos