Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
Sex modifies the association between bystander CPR and 30-day survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest:
Koichiro Shinozaki1, Nobuya Kitamura2, Takashi Tagami3
1Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Insights
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the effect differs significantly between men and women. Further research is needed to optimize resuscitation strategies for equitable care.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major global cause of death.
- Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for improving survival rates.
- The differential impact of bystander CPR on survival based on biological sex is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether biological sex modifies the association between bystander CPR and 30-day survival following OHCA.
- To analyze the effect of sex on the effectiveness of bystander CPR in OHCA patients.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter prospective cohort study involving 9081 adult OHCA patients in Japan (2019-2021).
- Analysis of 30-day survival as the primary outcome, comparing patients who received bystander CPR versus those who did not.
- Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and formal interaction analyses were used to assess sex-specific effects.
Main Results:
- Bystander CPR was associated with improved 30-day survival in men (aHR, 1.54) but not significantly in women (aHR, 1.33).
- Formal interaction analysis revealed a significant effect modification by sex (interaction P < 0.001).
- Crude survival rates were higher with bystander CPR for both sexes, and favorable neurological outcomes were also observed more frequently.
Conclusions:
- Biological sex is a significant effect modifier in the association between bystander CPR and OHCA survival.
- While bystander CPR benefits both sexes, the magnitude of its impact differs.
- Further research into sex-specific mechanisms is essential for optimizing resuscitation strategies and ensuring equitable care.
Background:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Although bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival after OHCA, whether its association with survival differs according to biological sex remains uncertain.
Objective:
To determine whether sex modifies the association between bystander CPR and 30-day survival following OHCA.
Methods:
We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study using the SOS-KANTO 2017 registry, including adult patients with OHCA treated at 42 emergency medical centers in Japan between September 2019 and March 2021. The primary exposure was bystander CPR, and the primary outcome was 30-day survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed separately for men and women after adjustment for clinically relevant covariates. A formal interaction analysis was performed to evaluate whether the association between bystander CPR and survival differed by sex. Sensitivity analyses excluding targeted temperature management from the adjustment model and exploratory analyses of favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1-2) were also conducted.
Results:
Among 9081 eligible patients, 5622 (61.9%) were men and 3459 (38.1%) were women. Crude 30-day survival was higher among patients receiving bystander CPR in both men (11.0% vs. 4.5%) and women (5.4% vs. 3.4%). After multivariable adjustment, bystander CPR remained independently associated with 30-day survival in men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.92) but not in women (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.93-1.91). Formal interaction analysis demonstrated significant effect modification by sex (interaction P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses excluding targeted temperature management yielded similar results. Exploratory analyses demonstrated higher crude rates of favorable neurological outcome among patients receiving bystander CPR in both sexes.
Conclusions:
Bystander CPR was associated with improved 30-day survival after OHCA in both sexes; however, the magnitude of this association differed by sex. Formal interaction and sensitivity analyses support biological sex as a potential effect modifier of the association between bystander CPR and survival. Further investigation into the biological and clinical mechanisms underlying these differences may help optimize resuscitation strategies while ensuring equitable delivery of bystander CPR.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Bystander Effect
