Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026
Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
Published on: October 25, 2024
Ovarian reserve as a measure of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in hormone receptor positive (HR-positive),
K Kalinsky1, W E Barlow2, H B Pathak3
1Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Background:
The phase 3 RxPONDER trial compared endocrine therapy (ET) alone or with chemotherapy (CET) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer with recurrence score (RS) ≤25. CET benefit for the primary outcome, invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), was limited to premenopausal women who largely did not receive ovarian function suppression. In this study, we assessed hormones associated with ovarian reserve to further refine the prediction of CET benefit.
Patients And Methods:
Pretreatment serum estradiol, progesterone, follicule-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and inhibin B (INHB) were assessed in a blinded fashion from 1556 participants aged <55 years. All markers used a predefined cut point. Associations with markers and IDFS and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were evaluated for prediction of CET benefit, adjusting for RS. Cox regression analyses of assigned treatment and its interaction with potential markers were adjusted for multiplicity.
Results:
Baseline estradiol, progesterone, LH, and FSH were not predictive for CET benefit. AMH ≥10 pg/ml showed significant interaction with chemotherapy benefit for IDFS (Padj = 0.0034). In 64% of women with AMH ≥10 pg/ml (cut-off for normal ovarian reserve), IDFS was superior with CET compared with ET alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65, Padj = 0.00012], whereas CET was not beneficial in the 36% with low ovarian reserve (AMH <10 pg/ml; HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.81-1.99, Padj = 0.47). DRFS showed a similar pattern of results for AMH. Ultrasensitive INHB measured in the pg/ml range was also predictive of CET benefit.
Conclusion:
Among premenopausal patients aged <55 years, participants with baseline AMH <10 pg/ml did not benefit from CET. AMH was a significantly better indicator of CET benefit than menopause status, age, or other hormones. Measures of ovarian reserve may refine the selection of patients for CET.