Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
Complication-related Removal of Central Venous Ports: Comparison of Subclavian and Upper Arm Approaches
Tomokazu Takeuchi1,2, Soma Kumasaka3, Hiroyuki Tokue3
1Department of Radiology, Gunma University Hospital, Japan.
Purpose:
To compare overall and cause-specific complication-related central venous port removal, particularly infection-related removal and catheter fracture, and time-to-event outcomes between the subclavian and upper arm approaches.
Material And Methods:
This retrospective study included 1,195 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided central venous port implantation via the subclavian (n = 706) or upper arm (n = 489) approach between 2012 and 2021. Comparative analyses were restricted to a maximum of 5 years after implantation. A total of 621,902 catheter-days were analyzed. The evaluated outcomes were overall complication-related central venous port removal and cause-specific removals, including infection-related removal, catheter fracture, malposition, occlusion, leakage, and venous thrombosis. Crude incidence rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression, adjusted incidence rate ratios using a negative binomial model, and removal-free survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results:
Within 5 years, complication-related removals occurred in 50 patients (7.1%) in the subclavian group and 41 (8.4%) in the upper arm group. Crude incidence rates were 0.131 and 0.171 per 1,000 catheter-days, respectively (crude incidence rate ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.16; p = 0.211). Adjusted analysis showed no significant difference between approaches (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-2.00; p = 0.786). Infection-related removal was more frequent in the upper arm group (crude incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.91; p = 0.020). Catheter fractures occurred only in the subclavian group (12/706, 1.7%; 0.031 per 1,000 catheter-days). Overall, removal-free survival did not differ significantly (p = 0.234), whereas infection-free and fracture-free survival differed significantly.
Conclusions:
Overall complication-related removal rates were similar between the approaches, but complication profiles differed.
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Veins of Upper Limbs
The deep venous system is primarily composed of the ulnar and radial veins. The ulnar vein, which drains the fingers through the superficial palmar venous arches, and the radial vein, which serves the palms via the deep palmar...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
