Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
Optimization of levosimendan before left ventricular assist device implantation in pediatric patients
Abdulkadir Yılmaz1, Sinan Sabit Kocabeyoglu1, Ümit Kervan1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Preoperative levosimendan in pediatric patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is safe and improves organ function, but does not reduce mortality or right ventricular failure compared to standard therapy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric cardiology
- Cardiovascular surgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in pediatric patients is a complex procedure with significant challenges.
- Optimizing perioperative management is crucial for improving outcomes in this unique patient population.
- Levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, has shown potential in adult cardiac surgery but its role in pediatric LVAD recipients is less defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of preoperative levosimendan administration on postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of levosimendan in this specific cohort.
- To compare outcomes between patients receiving levosimendan and those receiving standard inotropic therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center study of pediatric patients (<18 years) undergoing LVAD implantation, excluding INTERMACS class 1.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n=14) received preoperative levosimendan plus standard inotropic therapy; Group B (n=17) received standard inotropic therapy alone.
- Primary outcomes included early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes assessed right ventricular assist, late right ventricular failure, and organ function.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in early right ventricular failure, in-hospital mortality, or length of stay between the levosimendan and control groups.
- Rates of right ventricular assist and late right ventricular failure were comparable between groups.
- While both groups showed organ function improvements, the levosimendan group exhibited significantly greater reductions in liver enzymes (AST, ALT); no treatment-limiting side effects were noted.
Conclusions:
- Preoperative levosimendan administration is safe for pediatric LVAD candidates.
- Levosimendan demonstrated improved end-organ function, particularly liver function, in pediatric LVAD recipients.
- The study did not show levosimendan's superiority over standard inotropic therapy in preventing right ventricular failure or reducing mortality in this population.
Objective:
The pediatric patient group undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is small and unique. Many efforts have been made to prolong survival. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of levosimendan administration on postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
Methods:
This retrospective single-center study included patients under 18 years of age who underwent LVAD implantation. Patients with INTERMACS class 1 were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 14), who received levosimendan preoperatively in addition to standard inotropic therapy, and Group B (n = 17), who received standard inotropic therapy alone. Levosimendan was administered at a dose of 0.1 µg/kg/min for 72 h without a loading bolus. Primary outcomes were early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for right ventricular assist, late right ventricular failure, and changes in organ function as assessed by liver and kidney function tests. Safety points for drug administration were defined as arrhythmia, hypotension, and sudden arrest.
Results:
Baseline characteristics (except LVEDD), ventricular function, and vasoactive inotropic scores were similar between the groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of early right ventricular failure, in-hospital mortality, or length of hospital stay. The rates of need for right ventricular assist and late right ventricular failure were comparable. Improvements in organ function were observed in both groups; significantly greater reductions in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were recorded in the levosimendan group. No treatment-limiting side effects were observed.
Conclusion:
Preoperative levosimendan administration seems to be safe in pediatric LVAD candidates and is associated with improved end-organ function, although it has not demonstrated superiority over standard inotropic therapy in terms of preventing right ventricular failure or reducing mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents