Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)
Published on: April 21, 2019
Microneedles for allergy skin testing: Comprehensive analysis of agreement, accuracy, and pain
Manaporn Sirichuwong1, Kantima Kanchanapoomi1, Surapon Piboonpocanun2
1Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background:
The skin prick test (SPT) is a standard method for identifying allergic sensitization. However, pain and needle phobia often compromise pediatric compliance. Microneedle devices offer a minimally invasive alternative to conventional lancets.
Objective:
We evaluated the agreement, diagnostic accuracy, and patient tolerability of a novel microneedle compared to a lancet for SPT.
Methods:
Subjects with allergic rhinitis underwent SPT using both devices with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) extract, histamine, and saline controls. Net mean wheal diameters (MWD) were calculated by subtracting the saline MWD from the Dp and histamine MWDs. Agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and Cohen kappa (k), diagnostic performance by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and pain by a visual analog scale.
Results:
Of 150 subjects (aged 8-60 years), 53.3% were sensitized to Dp. Both devices produced significantly larger Dp and histamine MWDs than saline MWD (P < .001). Median [interquartile range] Dp MWD was smaller with microneedle (2 [0-8.13] mm) than lancet (4 [0-12.5 mm], P < .001). For net Dp MWD, Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of -2.1 mm for microneedle, with 93.3% within the limits of agreement. With lancet used as the reference, the microneedle had an area under the curve of 0.904. At a 3 mm cutoff, sensitivity was 82.5%, specificity 94.3%, and accuracy 86%. Interdevice concordance was good (k = 0.76). Median pain scores were significantly lower for microneedle (2.5 [0-9]) compared to lancet (8.0 [1-26], P < .001).
Conclusion:
The microneedle demonstrates high diagnostic performance and good concordance with the standard lancet while significantly reducing pain, thus supporting its utility in pediatric and needle-averse populations.

