Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Generalist and subspecialist provider perspectives on using agenda setting with patients after communication skills
Marcy Rosenbaum1, Kelly Skelly1, William Tsai1
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Objectives:
Agenda setting is an evidence-based communication skill that has been shown to support higher patient satisfaction and more efficient clinical encounters. This study investigates the impact of a hospital-wide communication skills program (CSP) on providers' use of agenda setting, factors that may influence agenda setting use, and potential barriers to implementing the skill from the providers' perspective.
Methods:
Following a CSP combining experiential workshops with in-person coaching, participants were invited to complete a survey collecting: 1) demographic information, 2) self-perceived frequency of agenda setting use, and 3) self-perceived barriers to agenda setting use.
Results:
308 providers across 25 medical specialties completed the survey and were categorized into specialty groups of primary care, surgical, nonsurgical and emergency medicine/intensive. All specialty groups saw a statistically significant increase in reported frequency of using agenda setting since completing the CSP. However, use of agenda setting before and after CSP varied by specialty group. Commonly identified barriers to use include forgetting to do it, interfering with visit flow, and not fitting with specific visit types.
Discussion:
While a provider communication program combining experiential workshop with individual coaching led to increased use of agenda setting for all participants, differences between specialties in perceived relevance and feasibility of using agenda setting were demonstrated to be highly context specific. Specialty-specific and common barriers across all groups may reflect a lack of understanding and/or experience with the potential benefits of agenda setting.
Practical Implications:
Findings imply that there is likely a need to tailor training to the contexts and unique challenges of different specialty groups to better enable them to apply agenda setting in their context. Providers may need help in seeing how agenda setting can fit into their unique practice settings; utilizing post-training coaching and reinforcement could help.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation

