A systematic review of human avoidance learning: Cognition, computation, and methods

Avoidance behaviour is fundamental for survival but can become maladaptive in clinical conditions. A large body of literature has accumulated on the dynamics of human avoidance learning. However, current theories and overviews do not provide an exhaustive account of this evidence. In this systematic review, we identify N = 116 studies on human avoidance learning. We analyse these studies with the goal of distilling robust empirical phenomena as a basis for theory-building, and examine their diagnostic value in differentiating between competing theories. We find that the evidence is difficult to reconcile with foundational two-factor and classical safety-signal accounts, and most strongly supports expectancy- and inference-based views in which avoidance responses are selected with respect to represented consequences. At the same time, no current framework provides a complete account of the evidence: several findings point to an additional role for operant valuation, Pavlovian influences, and contextual or latent-state control over the expression of avoidance. Methodologically, we observe that the problem setting in the most common experimental paradigms is radically simpler than real-world avoidance and therefore unlikely to expose the limits of inferential or reflective mechanisms. Consequently, we argue that paradigms with greater computational demands and more realistic action affordances are required to identify the mechanisms underlying avoidance learning. Collectively, these insights provide a foundation for theoretical refinement, computational modelling, and methodological innovation, with implications for advancing interventions targeting maladaptive avoidance.