Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Contrasting ultrasound findings in pacemaker lead perforation with and without cardiac tamponade
James Chan1,2, Derek Davis2, Katrina Shafer3
1Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA chan.332@osu.edu.
Insights
Pacemaker lead perforation can cause pericardial effusion. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) helps differentiate tamponade from stable effusions by integrating imaging with clinical assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Pacemaker lead perforation is a known cause of iatrogenic pericardial effusion.
- Pericardial effusion can lead to life-threatening cardiac tamponade.
- Rapid bedside evaluation is crucial for managing these complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To illustrate the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in differentiating hemodynamically significant cardiac tamponade from stable pericardial effusion in pacemaker lead perforation cases.
- To highlight the importance of integrating POCUS findings with clinical presentation for accurate diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Case study presentation of two patients with pacemaker-associated hemopericardium.
- Utilized point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for rapid bedside assessment.
- Correlated sonographic findings with clinical status and hemodynamic stability.
Main Results:
- Presented two distinct cases: one with hemodynamic instability and clear tamponade, the other with a massive effusion but initially stable without tamponade.
- Demonstrated POCUS's capability to differentiate between tamponade physiology and large effusions.
- Emphasized the necessity of a holistic patient evaluation.
Conclusions:
- POCUS is a vital tool for the rapid assessment of pericardial effusion in pacemaker lead perforation.
- Distinguishing tamponade requires integrating POCUS data with the patient's overall clinical condition.
- Comprehensive evaluation, combining imaging and clinical assessment, is key to appropriate management.
Abstract:
Pacemaker lead perforation is a recognised cause of iatrogenic pericardial effusion and may progress to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is essential for rapid bedside evaluation, yet the distinction between a large but haemodynamically stable effusion and true tamponade physiology requires integration of sonographic findings and clinical presentation. We present two cases of pacemaker-associated haemopericardium with markedly different physiological consequences: one showed haemodynamic instability with clear tamponade and the other initially stable without tamponade despite a massive effusion. This case pair demonstrates how POCUS can be used to differentiate these states and underscores the importance of evaluating both the heart and the patient as a whole.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings II: Auscultation
Abnormal Heart Sounds
Gallops:
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...

