Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy before DOAC initiation in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a
Guan-Xin Hou1, Adili Tuersun2,3, Zuo-Jun Wang1
1Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of PLA, Shenyang, China.
Insights
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed no benefit for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) after adjusting for stroke severity. Baseline stroke severity independently predicted outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Optimal antiplatelet bridging strategy before direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is unclear.
- Current guidelines lack definitive recommendations for pre-DOAC antiplatelet therapy in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as a bridge to DOACs in AIS patients with NVAF.
- To identify predictors of early and long-term outcomes in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 120 AIS patients with NVAF receiving antiplatelet therapy before DOAC initiation.
- Patients were stratified into SAPT (n=48) and DAPT (n=72) groups.
- Outcomes included early neurological improvement/deterioration, bleeding, and 90-day functional outcomes (mRS). Multivariate and ordinal logistic regression were used for analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in early neurological improvement, deterioration, or bleeding between SAPT and DAPT groups.
- Unadjusted analysis showed higher 90-day favorable outcomes with DAPT (90.3% vs. 75.0%, p=0.046).
- Multivariable adjustment eliminated this association (aOR 2.40, p=0.211), with baseline NIHSS score being the independent predictor for all outcomes (p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The apparent benefit of DAPT over SAPT in unadjusted analysis was likely due to selection bias, not a true therapeutic advantage.
- Current data do not support DAPT superiority over SAPT for AIS patients with NVAF bridging to DOACs.
- Baseline stroke severity (NIHSS) is a critical independent predictor of outcomes in this population, warranting confirmation in prospective trials.
Background:
The optimal antiplatelet bridging strategy before initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains uncertain.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study included 120 patients with AIS and NVAF who received antiplatelet therapy prior to DOAC initiation. Patients were stratified by regimen: single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, n = 48) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, n = 72). Primary outcomes included early neurological improvement (≥2-point NIHSS reduction), early neurological deterioration (≥4-point NIHSS increase or death within 48 h), and in-hospital bleeding. Secondary outcomes were 90-day favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), 90-day excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), and ordinal mRS shift. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors. Ordinal logistic regression was used for mRS shift analysis.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, with no significant differences in baseline NIHSS score (median 4.00 vs. 2.00, p = 0.136) or mRS score (median 3.00 vs. 3.00, p = 0.435). No significant differences were observed in early neurological improvement (39.6% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.969), early deterioration (4.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.158), or bleeding events (6.2% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.301). In unadjusted analysis, DAPT demonstrated higher 90-day favorable outcome (90.3% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.046). However, after multivariable adjustment, DAPT was not independently associated with mRS 0-2 (adjusted OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.62-10.06, p = 0.211), mRS 0-1 (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.43-3.14, p = 0.739), or ordinal mRS shift (adjusted common OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.34-1.44, p = 0.336). Baseline NIHSS score independently predicted all outcomes (p < 0.001 for all).
Conclusion:
In unadjusted analysis, DAPT prior to DOAC initiation was associated with higher 90-day favorable functional outcome without excess bleeding risk. However, this association was not independent of baseline stroke severity after multivariable adjustment, suggesting that the crude benefit was largely attributable to selection bias rather than a true therapeutic advantage of DAPT. The current data do not support the superiority of DAPT over SAPT. Baseline NIHSS score independently predicted both short-term and long-term outcomes. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant confirmation in adequately powered prospective randomized trials.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
