Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Assessing the Economic Feasibility and Social Impact of Proton Therapy: Implementation in Mexico and Latin America
Mauricio E Gámez1, César Ulises Monjarás Ávila1, Velia Verónica Rangel Ramírez1
1Radiation Oncology Department, Theralis Institute, San Luis Potosi, S.L.P., Mexico.
Purpose:
Proton therapy (PT) can reduce radiation exposure to healthy tissues can reduce radiation exposure to healthy tissues and improve oncologic outcomes in specific scenarios, but its high capital cost and operational complexity have limited access in Latin America.
Methods And Materials:
This exploratory cross-sectional study combined an environmental and market scan with semistructured interviews of 54 private insured adults with cancer from eight largest and most representative countries in the Americas. We examined awareness of PT, treatment decision-making, pereceived benefits, potential costs, barriers, and willingness to receive treatment at a proposed center in Mexico.
Results:
Prior awareness of PT as a cancer treatment option was very low (3.7%), although 70.4% of participants expressed interest in new cancer therapies and 55.6% preferred shared treatment decisions with their physician. After receiving a standardized explanation of PT, 40.7% expressed interest in receiving treatment; additional participants reported conditional interest related to insurance coverage, affordability, physician recommendation, treatment effectiveness, or further information. Travel was the most frequently perceived disadvantage, while potential treatment costs was the second most common.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate social interest and potential impact in a regional PT service but do not fully confirm and establish economic viability. A center in Mexico could reduce cross-border travel and support regional clinical training and research, particularly for patients with indications likely to benefit from PT. However, implementation should be phased and accompanied by a formal needs assessment, clinical eligibility modeling, payer engagement, workforce development, and a country-specific cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analysis.

