Manuka Honey Sinus Irrigation Versus Systemic Itraconazole in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Randomised Clinical

Khalaf Hamead1, Mostafa Ismail1, Abdelrahim A Abdelkarim1

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.

Abstract

Insights

Manuka honey sinus irrigation significantly improved allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) symptoms post-surgery compared to oral itraconazole. This natural therapy offers a promising alternative for AFRS management.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Allergy Immunology
  • Medical Mycology

Background:

  • Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a chronic sinus condition linked to fungal allergies.
  • Current treatments include endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with medical therapies, often involving oral antifungals.
  • There is a need for alternative therapies with fewer systemic side effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Manuka honey sinus irrigation versus oral itraconazole for postoperative AFRS management.
  • To compare Manuka honey's efficacy against a standard antifungal treatment.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized clinical trial involved 30 patients diagnosed with AFRS post-ESS.
  • Patients received either oral itraconazole or Manuka honey sinus irrigation for 6 weeks.
  • Outcomes were monitored for 6 months.

Main Results:

  • Manuka honey irrigation led to significant improvements in endoscopic scores, IgE levels, and SNOT-22 scores.
  • Radiological scores and infection rates were comparable between groups.
  • No significant difference in Lund-Mackay radiological scores or postoperative sinus infections was observed.

Conclusions:

  • Postoperative Manuka honey sinus irrigation is more effective than oral itraconazole in managing AFRS.
  • It shows promise for reducing symptoms and preventing recurrence.
  • Manuka honey represents a viable alternative therapeutic option for AFRS.

Related Concept Videos