Evaluating the efficacy and safety of macrolide therapy in primary ciliary dyskinesia: A systematic review

Masoumeh Ghasempour Alamdari1, Paniz Pourpashang2, Simin Khayatzadeh Kakhki3

  • 1Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Bahrami Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Medicine
|August 22, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Macrolide therapy, particularly azithromycin, may reduce respiratory exacerbations and improve symptoms in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Further research is needed due to limited evidence quality.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder impacting ciliary function and mucociliary clearance.
  • PCD leads to recurrent respiratory infections and progressive lung damage.
  • Macrolides, like azithromycin, possess anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties potentially beneficial for PCD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the efficacy and safety of macrolide therapy in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia.
  • To evaluate the potential of macrolides in managing PCD symptoms and respiratory exacerbations.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Searched multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar) for studies from 1990 to 2024.
  • Included 9 studies (2 in vitro, 7 clinical) with diverse designs; meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests macrolides, especially azithromycin, may decrease respiratory exacerbations and improve clinical symptoms in PCD patients.
  • In vitro studies indicate azithromycin can reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and aid epithelial repair.
  • Significant heterogeneity in study design, patient characteristics, and outcome measures was noted.

Conclusions:

  • Macrolides, particularly azithromycin, show potential benefits in managing PCD by reducing exacerbations and inflammation.
  • The current evidence is limited by study heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and a lack of robust randomized controlled trials.
  • Larger, well-designed PCD-specific trials are essential to confirm findings and standardize treatment protocols.