Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Field-controlled interfacial transport and pinning in an active spin system
Mintu Karmakar1,2,3, Matthieu Mangeat4, Swarnajit Chatterjee5
1University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou Institute of the , Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325011, China.
None:
Field control provides a practical route to programmable active matter, yet how weak fields modify nonequilibrium coexistence and interfaces remains unclear. To address this, we study a minimal flocking model of active Potts particles coupled to an external field and show that even weak fields can reconfigure phase behavior and interfacial dynamics. For a homogeneous unidirectional field, the flocking phase is reshaped: the coexistence regime between an apolar gas and a polar liquid is replaced by a phase separation between two field-aligned polar phases: a low-density, weakly polarized background and a high-density, strongly polarized band, both moving along the field. When the system forms a dense longitudinal lane oriented transverse to the field, it executes a slow treadmilling motion against the field, driven by the weakly polarized background. If the system is divided into regions with opposite field directions, particles accumulate at the interface, leading to field-induced interface pinning with flocks performing back-and-forth oscillatory motion. In the presence of quenched random field orientations, this pinning favors a disordered state in which global order diminishes with increasing system size, consistent with Imry-Ma arguments, while the quenched disorder smoothens sharp first-order signatures, in line with the Aizenman-Wehr theorem, with activity modifying the scaling. A coarse-grained hydrodynamic theory supports these observations and is consistent with microscopic simulations.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Mechanism of Filopodia Formation
Their main function is to guide migrating cells during normal tissue morphogenesis or cancer metastasis by recognizing and making initial contacts with the extracellular matrix. However, they can also act as stationary cell anchors or help to establish communication...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

