Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Published on: October 15, 2019
Validation of a long-read 16S rRNA-gene sequencing approach for analysis of clinical samples and bacterial
Otto Van de Gaer1, Reinoud Cartuyvels1, Timo Froyen1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Background:
Currently, microbiological diagnosis relies heavily on classical culture-based techniques, which have notable limitations. These methods often struggle with detecting non-culturable or slow-growing microorganisms and can yield negative results in patients who have already received antimicrobial treatment before sample collection. 16S rRNA gene sequencing offers an alternative to culture-based methods, enabling bacterial identification without the need for cultivation. This study presents the validation and clinical implementation of a 16S rRNA-gene Nanopore-based sequencing workflow in a routine hospital.
Methods:
Estimated limit of detection and linearity were investigated using spiking experiments with a dilution series of ATCC strains and commercial quality control material. Accuracy and including taxonomic resolution was evaluated for 37 strains obtained from external quality control programs and 30 clinical from a clinical collection. Utility was investigated by comparing 16S rRNA gene Nanopore-based sequencing with culture results and other clinical findings for 54 prospectively collected clinical samples.
Results:
An estimated limit of detection of 260 and 747 CFU/ml was found for respectively Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in synovial fluid. R2 analysis ranged from 0.9778 to 0.9986 depending on sample matrix. Correct genus level identification of strains was >98% and correct species level identification was >85%. 25/26 clinical culture-positive samples tested positive with 16S sequencing. Additional clinically relevant pathogens were detected in 5/28 culture-negative and 7/26 culture-positive samples.
Discussion:
This study demonstrates that the implementation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing is feasible in a routine clinical laboratory setting and provides additional utility for the identification of bacterial isolates and direct detection on clinical samples, increasing recovery of non-culturable isolates.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Rapid Identification of Pathogens

