Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Declared Inactive Ingredients in US Oral Drug Listings: A Reproducible Census of Prevalence, Labeling Coverage, and
1Pharmacy, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA.
None:
Background A current assessment of structured drug labeling can update excipient-declaration prevalence, quantify structured-data coverage, and describe variation among listings sharing a prescription generic name. Building on prior formulation-level analyses, this study contributes a current, fully reproducible public-data snapshot with pharmacologic-class-resolved declaration patterns and a within-generic-name declaration-consistency analysis. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a published census derived from the openFDA National Drug Code (NDC) Directory export dated 2026-07-18 and DailyMed Structured Product Labeling (SPL). The analytic denominator comprised 50,005 distinct oral Product NDC listings with an exact SPL product match and at least one structured inactive-ingredient (IACT) declaration. We described listing-level excipient burden and prevalence, unique qualitative excipient profiles, structured-declaration availability, and patterns across dosage forms, marketing categories, and Established Pharmacologic Classes (EPCs). A predefined Unique Ingredient Identifier (UNII)-based panel identified selected avoidance-relevant excipients. Among prescription generic-name groups with at least two listings, we identified affected groups in which every observed listing declared the target. Results Listings declared a median of nine excipients (interquartile range {IQR}, 6-12; maximum, 41). Magnesium stearate (68.07%), titanium dioxide (53.27%), and microcrystalline cellulose (52.88%) were most prevalent. The 50,005 listings contained 13,540 unique qualitative declared excipient profiles, a mean of 3.69 listings per profile. Among exact SPL product matches, 97.99% contained at least one structured IACT declaration. Lactose was declared in 39.34% of listings, gelatin in 18.5%, and at least one panel-defined synthetic color additive in 39.96%. Within affected prescription generic-name groups, every observed listing declared lactose in 306 of 657 groups (46.58%) and gelatin in 150 of 322 groups (46.58%). Conclusions Declared excipients were common and varied across product and pharmacologic-class strata. Many listings shared the same qualitative excipient profile, although profile identity does not establish formulation identity. In some prescription generic-name groups, every observed listing declared an avoidance target. These findings describe structured declarations rather than actual composition, dispensing exposure, or therapeutic interchangeability.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Nomenclature
Drug Regulation
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Drug Classes and Categories
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Pharmaceutical Equivalents

