Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
CEAP-Guided and Kistner-Refined Selection of Deep Venous Intervention for Primary Lower-Limb Venous Valvular
Baiqiang Zhang1, Jinghe Zhu1, Sijing Wang1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, P.R. China; Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 82 Xinhua South Road, Tongzhou District, Beijing 101149, P.R. China.
Objective:
To evaluate whether Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical class and Kistner grade could guide the selection of deep venous intervention for primary lower-limb venous valvular incompetence.
Design:
Two-center retrospective cohort study.
Methods:
A total of 578 consecutive eligible limbs with primary lower-limb venous valvular incompetence and available venographic and clinical records between 2015 and 2025 were grouped as conservative management (n = 241), superficial-only treatment (n = 240), deep-only treatment (n = 44), or combined treatment (n = 53). Deep intervention mainly consisted of femoral vein valvoplasty; combined treatment comprised femoral valvoplasty plus superficial treatment, most often radiofrequency ablation, with high ligation and stripping when indicated. The primary outcome was VCSS improvement. Analyses were performed hierarchically in C3 group, the overall C4-C6 population, the C4-C6 Kistner grade 3-4 isolated deep reflux subgroup, and an all-CEAP Kistner grade 3-4 sensitivity population.
Results:
In C3 group, combined treatment provided no additional VCSS benefit versus superficial venous-only treatment (adjusted β 0.1, 95% CI -1.6 to 1.9; p = .872). In C4-C6 population, combined treatment achieved greater VCSS improvement than superficial venous-only treatment (adjusted β 1.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 3.1; p = .007). In C4-C6 limbs with Kistner grade 3-4 isolated deep venous reflux, combined treatment showed greater benefit than superficial venous-only treatment (adjusted β 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.6; p = .008) and conservative management (adjusted β 4.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 7.0; p = .005). All-CEAP Kistner grade 3-4 sensitivity analyses showed directionally consistent results.
Conclusion:
Selective femoral vein valvoplasty combined with superficial venous treatment may be clinically justified in C4-C6 disease, especially with Kistner grade 3-4 reflux, but is not supported in C3 disease.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Varicose Veins I: Introduction
