Debunking the myth: Does precepting really lower nurse practitioner productivity?

The 2021 AACN Essentials emphasize the importance of preparing practice-ready nurses at all levels, making access to high-quality clinical experiences a critical component of nurse practitioner (NP) education. However, the national shortage of NP student preceptors is a significant challenge for NP educational programs that can jeopardize the clinical learning environment. One commonly cited barrier to precepting NP students is the belief that precepting reduces productivity.

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if precepting NP students was associated with differences in productivity, as measured by relative value units (RVUs).

Nineteen preceptors from family, adult-gerontology acute care, adult-gerontology primary care, and psychiatric mental health NP tracks within a Doctor of Nursing Practice program were identified. Preceptors practiced in outpatient specialty areas and had precepted an NP student at least three times during the previous 3 years. Billing data were used to obtain RVUs for semesters in which NPs precepted students and semesters in which they did not. Average RVUs were then compared across semesters.

Mean RVUs were significantly higher during semesters in which NPs precepted students compared with semesters in which they did not.

This pilot study challenges the belief that precepting NP students reduces productivity.

Colleges of nursing and health systems should partner to examine productivity data of NP student preceptors to clarify the impact of precepting on productivity and inform evidence-based strategies to support NP clinical education and the NP workforce pipeline.