Related Experiment Videos
Characteristics of Outpatient Care Settings Associated with Implementation Outcomes for a Group Physical Therapy
Kelli D Allen1,2, Leah L Zullig1,3, Sara Webb1
1Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States.
Importance:
Novel care models, like group-based physical therapy (Group Physical Therapy), improve outcomes and operational efficiency, but implementation is challenging and understudied.
Objective:
The objective was to assess associations of organizational and contextual characteristics with implementation of Group Physical Therapy for knee osteoarthritis.
Design:
This study involved secondary analysis of a cluster randomized hybrid type III implementation trial.
Setting:
The study involved outpatient physical therapy departments in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Administration (VHA).
Participants:
Participants were VHA sites that agreed to deliver a Group Physical Therapy program (n = 19).
Exposures:
Exposures included facility organizational and contextual characteristics.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Implementation outcomes were adoption (overall and time to adopt) and penetration (number of Veterans enrolled over 12 months). Site characteristics included: organizational readiness to implement change (ORIC), organizational resilience via the benchmark resilience tool (BRT), implementation climate scale (ICS), prior implementation experience, enrollment approach (cohort vs. rolling entry), delivery modality (in person vs. telehealth), rurality, and facility complexity. Descriptive statistics were computed for implementation outcomes.
Results:
Overall, 14 sites (74%) adopted Group Physical Therapy, and the mean number of days to adopt was 230 (standard deviation [SD] = 74). High rurality sites (serving ≥50% rural Veterans) were less likely to adopt than low rurality sites (50% vs 80%) and took longer to adopt. Sites delivering Group Physical Therapy via telehealth and those using cohort enrollment were later adopters. High rural sites and those using a cohort enrollment approach had lower penetration. The ORIC, BRT and ICS scores were all high, and there were no substantial differences in adoption or penetration based on these measures.
Conclusion:
Rural sites may need additional support when implementing new physical therapy programs. Telehealth delivery and cohort-based enrollment may also present challenges that need to be addressed during pre-implementation planning.
Relevance:
Results provide considerations for the implementation planning process to bridge the gap from research to real world clinical practice in the rehabilitation setting.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:26Group Therapy
01:29Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
01:19Restorative Care