Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Fibular Artery Septocutaneous Perforators
Jannik Ketschau1, Jonathan Mohr1, Yannik Leonhardt2
1TUM University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bavaria, Germany, Munich.
Background:
Reliable identification of septocutaneous fibular artery perforators is important for free fibula flap harvest involving a skin paddle. While imaging modalities such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) provide high diagnostic accuracy for direct perforator visualization, they do not quantify segment-level probability of perforator presence based on global anatomical characteristics.
Methods:
In this retrospective CTA-based study, 246 patients (490 limbs) were analyzed. Each fibula was divided into 10 equal segments, yielding 4,900 limb-zone observations. Using limb-level anatomical and vascular parameters, machine learning models were developed to predict the presence of at least one perforator per segment. Data were split at the patient level (80% training, 20% testing). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC), and Brier score.
Results:
Overall segment-level perforator prevalence was 15.4%, and 20.6% of limbs exhibited no septocutaneous perforator. Ridge-regularized logistic regression (primary model) achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.684, PR-AUC of 0.243, and Brier score of 0.1214. Random forest achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.705, PR-AUC of 0.239, and Brier score of 0.1216. XGBoost achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.710, PR-AUC of 0.245, and Brier score of 0.1213. The generalized additive model yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.683, PR-AUC of 0.231, and Brier score of 0.1223. All approaches reproduced the characteristic midfibular peak in perforator probability.
Conclusion:
Machine learning enables moderate segment-level discrimination of perforator presence based on global anatomical features. While not comparable to imaging for direct vessel localization, probabilistic modeling may complement imaging by providing structured, patient-specific estimation of regional perforator likelihood.
