Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2026
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Root Canal Treatment vs Implants: Survival and Costs in a National Cohort
Fernando J Mota de Almeida1, Helena Fransson2, Jan Derks3
1Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 12 D, SE-413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Endodontics, Tandvårdens kompetenscentrum, Public Dental Service, Region Norrbotten, Skeppsbrogatan 22 (Box 922), SE-971 28, Luleå, Sweden.
Objective:
To evaluate tooth/implant survival and function time, as well as costs of root canal treatment versus extraction and replacement through implant therapy in the management of endodontic disease.
Methods:
This retrospective register-based cohort study used data from the Swedish Dental Health Register. Adults (≥20 yrs) diagnosed with endodontic disease (2015-2016) and provided with either root canal therapy (ENDO) or extraction and implant-supported replacement (IMPLANT) were followed until 2023. Survival was assessed in propensity score-matched groups (ENDO: 10,654; IMPLANT: 5,327 individuals) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Function time was expressed through restricted mean survival time (RMST), truncated at 7 yrs. Cumulative costs (3% annual discount applied) were estimated using mixed-effects regression models, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as cost per additional yr in function.
Results:
9-yr survival was 83.4% for ENDO and 97.9% for IMPLANT. RMST was 5.8 yrs for ENDO and 6.6 yrs for IMPLANT and respective mean cumulative costs were USD 1,243 and USD 2,667. With the exception of mandibular anterior sites, IMPLANT showed longer mean function times. The overall ICER was USD 1,874 per yr gained, ranging from USD 1,352 (maxillary molar sites) to USD 4,836 (maxillary anterior sites).
Conclusions:
Overall, survival and function time of implants replacing endodontically diseased teeth was greater than that of teeth following root canal treatment. Cumulative costs were higher for implant therapy. At mandibular anterior sites, however, root canal treatment resulted in higher survival and function time, at lower costs.
Clinical Significance:
While implant-based tooth replacement provided greater survival and function time than root canal treatment in general, benefits came at considerably higher cumulative costs. Site-specific differences were also evident as root canal treatment at anterior sites in the mandible resulted in both higher survival and lower treatment costs.
