Related Experiment Videos
Krenning score enhances integrated biomarker models for survival prediction in PRRT-treated GEP-NET: a retrospective
Christian A Dascalescu1, Felix L Herr2, Ricarda Ebner2
1Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Christian.Dascalescu@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Background:
Purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of a routinely available baseline SSTR-PET imaging parameter, the Krenning score (KS), within integrated biomarker models for overall survival prediction in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 178 patients with GEP-NET who underwent PRRT. At baseline, the KS, clinical, histopathological, and laboratory parameters were integrated and correlated with OS. OS predictors were identified using univariate Cox regression analysis and incorporated into multivariate models. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC).
Results:
In univariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with shorter OS: KS 3 vs. KS 4 (p = 0.042), CgA > 155 ng/mL (p = 0.003), NSE > 35 ng/mL (p = 0.042), BMI < 18.5 kg/m² (p = 0.017), CRP > 0.5 mg/dL (p = 0.045), albumin < 4.1 g/dL (p = 0.017), and Hb < 12 g/dL (p = 0.017). The multivariate Cox regression model including KS, hemoglobin, and NSE showed the lowest AIC (C-index = 0.64, CI: 0.57-0.71; AIC = 527.60), while the model incorporating BMI, hemoglobin, and CgA demonstrated the highest C-index (C-index = 0.66, CI: 0.60-0.72; AIC = 582.82).
Conclusion:
Integrated baseline biomarker models combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters may support overall survival risk stratification in GEP-NET patients undergoing PRRT. Incorporation of the routinely available Krenning score contributed to one of the best-performing parsimonious exploratory multivariable models, suggesting that accessible molecular imaging parameters may complement established baseline biomarkers. These exploratory findings require validation in larger, preferably multicenter, independent cohorts before clinical implementation.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.