Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
Published on: September 1, 2023
Review and Meta-Analyses of the Effects of MLC601/MLC901 (NeuroAiD) on Post-Stroke Functional and Motor Recovery
Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian1,2, Tsong-Hai Lee3, Hou Chang Chiu4
1Raffles Neuroscience Centre, 585 North Bridge Road, #09-00 Raffles Hospital, Singapore 188770, Singapore.
Abstract:
Background: Post-stroke recovery varies widely, and pharmacological options to enhance rehabilitation outcomes remain limited. MLC601/MLC901 (NeuroAiD), a natural neurorestorative product, has been evaluated as an adjunct to standard care to improve functional and motor recovery after ischaemic stroke. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed its efficacy using validated outcome measures. Methods: A systematic PubMed search identified randomised controlled trials comparing MLC601/MLC901 with placebo or active comparators in adults with ischaemic stroke. Functional outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), and Diagnostic Therapeutic Effects of Apoplexy (DTER) item 8 scores. Motor outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), DTER motor items, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) motor scores. Data were pooled using fixed- and random-effects models. Odds ratios (ORs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 1.0 tool. Results: Six publications reporting seven randomised clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of the 7 studies, 5 were assessed as having a low risk of bias, while 2 were assessed as having an unclear risk. Altogether, 1535 participants for functional outcomes and 1774 for motor outcomes were analysed. Functional recovery significantly favoured MLC601/MLC901 at 1 month (OR 2.61; p = 0.004), 6 months (OR 1.38; p = 0.002), 12 months (OR 1.33; p = 0.03), and end-of-study (OR 1.40; p = 0.007), with benefits persisting up to 24 months. Motor recovery was assessed at months 1, 2 and 3 and at the end of the study. It also improved consistently over time, with the greatest effects during the first two months. Benefits were most evident in patients with moderately severe stroke (NIHSS 8-14). Clinical studies consistently indicate that NeuroAiD is safe and well-tolerated as an adjunct to standard ischaemic stroke care. Conclusions: MLC601/MLC901 is associated with improved functional independence and motor recovery after ischaemic stroke. Benefits appear within 1 month and may persist for up to 2 years, supporting early use alongside rehabilitation to optimise recovery.