Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
Published on: June 23, 2012
Equity in genome sequencing for rare disease diagnosis: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the UK 100,000
Sam Tallman1, Loukas Moutsianas1, Thuy Nguyen1
1Genomics England, London, UK.
Background:
Genome sequencing has improved rare disease diagnosis and is now part of routine clinical care in the National Health Service in England. Automated prioritisation pipelines narrow millions of variants per patient to a small subset for clinical review, a process that relies on allele frequency resources that do not fully represent human genetic diversity. We assessed ancestry-related differences in variant prioritisation and diagnostic outcomes in patients from the UK 100,000 Genomes Project.
Methods:
We analysed 29,405 rare disease probands with genome sequencing and linked clinical outcomes data. We used multivariable regression to assess ancestry-related differences in the number of variants prioritised for clinical review, the proportion of prioritised variants that were recorded as diagnostic, and diagnostic yield. We also evaluated the use of ancestry-stratified allele frequency filters derived from an independent, diverse UK cohort (n = 33,724).
Findings:
Compared with the European ancestry group, the East African group had nearly three times more variants prioritised for clinical review (IRR 2.77, 95% CI 2.33-3.29). Other non-European groups also had significantly higher counts. Diagnostic yield was similar across ancestry groups after adjustment (LRT p = 0.1650). Prioritised variants were less likely to be recorded as diagnostic in East African (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.46), West African (0.47, 0.39-0.57), South Asian (0.65, 0.58-0.73), and Middle Eastern (0.68, 0.54-0.86) groups. Applying ancestry-stratified allele-frequency filters removed 3.1% of prioritised variants overall-24.3% in the East African group-without loss of diagnostic sensitivity, including 29.5% of recorded VUS in this group.
Interpretation:
Differences in the likelihood of prioritised variants being recorded as diagnostic partly reflect limitations of current allele frequency resources, which use broad population groupings that mask within-group diversity. Increased representation of diverse ancestries in reference databases and better estimation of ancestry-appropriate allele frequencies will help reduce inefficiencies and improve equity in variant prioritisation for rare disease diagnosis.
Funding:
The UK Department of Health and Social Care and the EU's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genomics
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.

