Related Experiment Videos
Few Do Most: National Patterns of Cognitive-to-Procedural Share among United States IR Physicians
Zain S Hussain1, Hamza Masood2, Sarah B White3
1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Southeast Health, Dothan, Alabama; Department of Radiology, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Purpose:
To quantify evaluation and management (E&M) billing patterns among U.S. interventional radiologists.
Materials And Methods:
A cross-sectional analysis was performed using a 100% sample of 2023 Medicare fee-for-service claims. Interventional radiologists were stratified into 3 mutually exclusive interventional radiologist (IR)-related workload tiers by work relative value unit (wRVU; 10%-49%, 50%-89%, and ≥90%). Multivariable negative-binomial regression was adjusted for total wRVUs and physician/practice characteristics.
Results:
Among 5,232 interventional radiologists, E&M billing increased disproportionately with IR-related workload. Across increasing IR-related workload, surgical procedure relative value units increased by 4.2-fold, whereas E&M relative value units increased by 23.9-fold. Only 23.5% of interventional radiologists billed ≥11 E&M claims. After adjustment for total wRVUs, interventional radiologists in the 10%-49% and 50%-89% workload tiers billed 90% fewer E&M encounters (adjusted relative rate ratio [aRRR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.11) and 28% fewer (aRRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79), respectively, than interventional radiologists in the ≥90% tier. Among interventional radiologists billing ≥11 E&M claims, tier-based differences attenuated, with the 50%-89% tier approaching parity with the ≥90% tier (aRRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.003). Female sex was associated with fewer E&M claims overall (aRRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89), but more in the ≥11-claim subset (aRRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52).
Conclusions:
E&M billing among U.S. interventional radiologists is concentrated among a minority of physicians and increases disproportionately with IR-related workload. Attenuation of workload-tier differences among interventional radiologists billing ≥11 E&M claims suggests observable E&M engagement reflects a distinct clinical practice model rather than a simple function of procedural volume. Structural factors, including sex, may influence participation in observable E&M billing.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Obedience
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Patient-centered Care
Reason and Intuition
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination