Walk-and-talk versus conventional psychotherapy for men with depressive symptoms: study protocol of a randomised...

Walk-and-talk therapy integrates psychological support and physical activity conducted in outdoor environments, and has potential to better align with men's preferences and masculine norms around emotional communication. Conventional indoor psychotherapy is effective for treating depression but can be less engaging for men, leading to less satisfaction and high rates of dropout. This trial aims to determine whether walk-and-talk therapy offers men with depressive symptoms clinically meaningful benefits over conventional indoor therapy.

This assessor-blinded, parallel group randomised controlled trial is comparing the efficacy of walk-and-talk therapy to conventional indoor therapy for men with depressive symptoms. After randomisation, all participants receive 10 fortnightly 1-hour individual psychotherapy sessions over 20 weeks as either: (1) conventional indoor therapy (sitting down indoors) or (2) walk-and-talk therapy (walking outdoors). Participants are assessed at 'pre-intervention' (baseline), 'post-intervention' (5 months post baseline) and 'follow-up' (12 months post baseline) time points. The primary outcome is change in overall psychological distress (21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21)) at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include male-type depression symptoms, mental well-being, suicidal ideation and quality of life. Costing data is being collected for cost-effectiveness analysis. Linear mixed models will be used to examine the impact of group (conventional indoor vs walk-and-talk), time (baseline, 5-month and 12-month) and the group-by-time interaction for primary and secondary outcomes.

This study is approved by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (H-2024-0090). Results will be published in an open access peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conference presentations.

ACTRN12624000794505.