Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Spray-Coated Melanin/PEDOT:PSS Films for Sustainable Organic Electrochemical Transistors
Published on: October 28, 2025
Adding flexibility to payments for environmental services enhances cost-effectiveness in the Brazilian Amazon
Gabriela Demarchi1, Julie Subervie2, Cauê D Carrilho3,4,5
1MoISA, Univ Montpellier, CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France. gabriela.demarchi@cirad.fr.
Abstract:
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) are widely used to protect tropical forests, but rigid pricing may fail when landowners' opportunity costs fluctuate. Inflexible incentives can lead to contract breaches, reducing environmental benefits. We test whether flexible PES contracts improve outcomes by allowing partial payments when deforestation remains below a threshold. Using a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction within a randomized controlled trial, we compare a flexible PES contract, a zero-deforestation contract, and a control group. Although the zero-deforestation contract had greater potential to avoid deforestation, high breach rates reduced realized conservation. The flexible PES contract, while more costly due to higher compliance, achieved greater forest protection per hectare: participants deforested 31% less than under the stringent contract in the peak period (95% CI [2%, 60%], d = 0.12). These findings suggest that flexible PES contracts can improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservation programs.
Related Concept Videos
Bioremediation
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Microbial Bioremediation of Pesticides
