Related Experiment Videos
Under-Identification of Malnutrition Within an Inpatient Hospital Setting
Jacqui Bailey1, Jolie Baird1,2, Olivia Dullard2
1Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Introduction:
Malnutrition contributes to significant health and economic burden. A 2022 Malnutrition Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) at Austin Health, Melbourne, reported a 40% prevalence rate, consistent with international studies. However, despite robust screening and referral processes, 28% of at-risk or malnourished patients were not receiving dietetic care on the PPS day. This study aimed to evaluate the rate and timing of electronic malnutrition screening tool (eMST) completion in adult inpatients against local hospital guidelines, compare the accuracy of nursing completed eMST with dietitian completed MST and identify common sources of error in screening completion and potential contributors for those patients who were identified as at risk of or with malnutrition and not receiving dietetic care.
Methods:
A retrospective case series of dietitian referrals, weights, time of eMST completion and MST results between admission and the PPS day were assessed for timeliness against hospital guidelines and accuracy based on available weight history, dietitian completed MST and nutrition impact symptoms documented in the electronic medical record (EMR).
Results:
On the day of the PPS 48 patients at-risk of (n = 19) or malnourished (SGA B n = 27, SGA C n = 2) were not receiving dietetic care. Of these, 60% (n = 29) missed dietetic care due to inaccurate MST completion. No weight loss (n = 20) was incorrectly reported despite patient reports or EMR data indicating otherwise. 35% of patients (n = 17) were weighed within 24 h of admission as per hospital guideline. 65% of MSTs completed during the morning nursing shift were inaccurate, compared with 48% during the afternoon and 36% during the night shift.
Conclusion:
This study examining the alignment between real-world screening practices and institutional guidelines for patients at risk of malnutrition identified clear gaps in the timely and accurate completion of MST screening and weight documentation. A multitude of factors likely influence this including nursing staff capacity, flawed design of EMR systems, and suboptimal protocol sequencing. Future research applying systems-level thinking is required.
Related Concept Videos
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Overview of Protein Metabolism
Amino acids play various roles in the body once they are absorbed into cells. They are restructured...
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...