Related Experiment Videos
Undetected Error Bounds for Hybrid Integrity Protection Using Reed-Muller Codes, Algebraic Manipulation Detection,
Buriboev Abror Shavkatovich1, Akmal Abduvaitov2, Jumanov Isroil2
1Department of Artificial Intelligence, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Ensuring information integrity requires not only reducing decoding errors but also reducing the probability that corrupted data are accepted as valid. This research presents a hybrid integrity protection system that incorporates seeded universal hash verification, algebraic manipulation detection (AMD), and a binary Reed-Muller outer code. Transmission over the binary symmetric channel BSC(p), outer encoding using RM(r, m), bounded-distance decoding, an εAMD-secure AMD layer, and a seeded 2-universal hash family with l-bit output define the model used in the analysis. Under explicitly stated freshness and conditional-independence assumptions, the system-level undetected error probability is upper-bounded by the residual decoder-miscorrection probability multiplied by the AMD acceptance bound and the seeded universal hash collision bound. A conservative alternative is also provided for settings in which the required conditional independence cannot be guaranteed. In this context, an explicit upper bound for the undetected error probability is derived. The outcome makes clear the different functions of outer coding and post-decoding verification and results in a direct dependency on the parameters r, m, p, and l. Finite-length Monte Carlo validation for a concrete instantiation based on RM(2, 5) complements the theoretical study and verifies that the hybrid construction offers a lower empirical undetected error probability compared to the comparable outer-only, AMD-only, and hash-only variations. The study does not propose new coding or verification primitives. Its contribution is a finite-length layered acceptance model and a Reed-Muller-specific undetected error analysis that incorporates the code weight distribution and bounded-distance decoding regions. The resulting spectrum-based bound distinguishes decoder miscorrection from the broader event of exceeding the guaranteed correction radius and is evaluated together with post-decoding verification and redundancy overhead. The model's formal manipulation detection and collision guarantees are provided by AMD and universal hash layers, while Reed-Muller code parameters and their standard distance formulas are conventional.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test